First result · 2026-09-19 19:24 UTC
each-alone / as-one — distributive vs collective: does the plural act once, or once each?
Not yet counting in evidence decisions. This row remains available for assessment, but does not currently carry a counting evidence result.
- What was measured
- token cost ·
token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population? - Reported result
- 0 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -1.125 to 0.Same token count on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
- English comparison
- English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
- Tokenizer conditions
- Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
- Named instruments
cl100k_base,o200k_base,p50k_baseReader population not separately declared.
- Conditions covered
- Separate outcomes retained for all 2 declared conditions
each-alone,as-oneAn overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
- Settlement role
- Awaiting independent settlement
An original reports one result. It does not confirm itself.
- Is this result within the cost allowance?
- No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
- Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
- Awaiting independent settlement.
An original reports one result. It does not confirm itself.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?
| Condition | Reported difference | Reported interval |
|---|---|---|
each-alone | -0.75 | Not recorded |
as-one | 0.75 | Not recorded |
A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 24 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1 · grove-catalogue-each
- English input
- Each of the four botanists produced a separate catalogue of the grove.
- Ainglish input
- The four botanists catalogued the grove, each-alone.
- Condition
- each-alone
Input 2 · grove-catalogue-one
- English input
- The four botanists produced one joint catalogue of the grove.
- Ainglish input
- The four botanists catalogued the grove, as-one.
- Condition
- as-one
Input 3 · ore-assay-each
- English input
- Each of the three laboratories performed a separate assay of the ore sample.
- Ainglish input
- The three laboratories assayed the ore sample, each-alone.
- Condition
- each-alone
Input 4 · ore-assay-one
- English input
- The three laboratories performed one joint assay of the ore sample.
- Ainglish input
- The three laboratories assayed the ore sample, as-one.
- Condition
- as-one
Input 5 · harbor-ruling-each
- English input
- Each of the five arbitrators issued a separate harbor ruling.
- Ainglish input
- The five arbitrators issued the harbor ruling, each-alone.
- Condition
- each-alone
Input 6 · harbor-ruling-one
- English input
- The five arbitrators issued one joint harbor ruling.
- Ainglish input
- The five arbitrators issued the harbor ruling, as-one.
- Condition
- as-one
Recorded input digest: 91cbfbf6f389d7effa4752c0fa41312e653a7ec18a91a9c62c25d0b75fe4a6c7
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
- Compared with
- each-alone/as-one versus complete English that explicitly states a separate instance per member or one joint/shared instance
- Tested population
- 24 frozen complete plural-predicate reports: both polarity forms in each of 12 new domains, balanced across actions and quantities
- Unit tested
- one complete plural-predicate report with explicit instance cardinality
- How results combine
- equal-pair mean per tokenizer over all 24 reports, then the least-favourable maximum tokenizer mean; retain both equal-weight polarity forms separately
These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Absolute arm results
Not recorded
Reader or tokenizer results
[
{
"model": "cl100k_base",
"value": -1.125
},
{
"model": "o200k_base",
"value": -1.0416666666666667406815349750104360282421112060546875
},
{
"model": "p50k_base",
"value": 0
}
]
Condition results
[
{
"id": "each-alone",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.5,
"value": -0.75,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
},
{
"id": "as-one",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.5,
"value": 0.75,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
}
]
Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history
Attempt 35943659-4fdd-4d83-8275-a3f6cf562a39
Content d3ada761bda744226568ff0c46bfcc600231c5882dfb0a3a6db9682d6b6056d9