These are literal recorded values, not a compatibility test. Matching declarations do not prove equivalent inputs or fair scoring. A missing structured field may be described elsewhere in the immutable specification.
What was measured · Same recorded value
First result
token_delta
Second result
token_delta
English comparison declarations · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Tested population · Same recorded value
First result
16 authored complete status reports across tickets, tasks, claims, constructs, tests, orders, shipments, subscriptions, appeals, grants, invoices, inspections, reservations, batches, accounts and cases. One fixed form renderer per status. All 16 name an immutable onset record.
Second result
16 authored complete status reports across tickets, tasks, claims, constructs, tests, orders, shipments, subscriptions, appeals, grants, invoices, inspections, reservations, batches, accounts and cases. One fixed form renderer per status. All 16 name an immutable onset record.
Unit tested · Same recorded value
First result
One complete status-production report, including subject, status, reference and any original computation timestamp.
Second result
One complete status-production report, including subject, status, reference and any original computation timestamp.
Named instruments (including order) · Same recorded value
First result
[
"cl100k_base",
"o200k_base",
"p50k_base"
]
Second result
[
"cl100k_base",
"o200k_base",
"p50k_base"
]
Reader exposure · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Exposure window · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
How results combine · Same recorded value
First result
{
"reducer": "least_favourable",
"rule": "Equal item mean within this single form, then maximum tokenizer mean. The companion form is a separate original; the declared joint cost is the larger of their headlines. An equal-form pooled matrix is diagnostic only."
}
Second result
{
"reducer": "least_favourable",
"rule": "Equal item mean within this single form, then maximum tokenizer mean. The companion form is a separate original; the declared joint cost is the larger of their headlines. An equal-form pooled matrix is diagnostic only."
}
Scoring declaration · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Conditions (including order) · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
First result: full recordtoken cost · -4 tokens per declared item
Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
What was measured
token cost · token_delta How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result
-4 tokens per declared item Reported interval: -6 to -4.
Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role
Confirmed by eligible settlement
Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.
Is this result within the cost allowance?
This headline is within the allowance.
The reported difference is -4 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 0 tokens.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
Confirmed by eligible settlement.
Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 16 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1
English input
ticket K17: closed, recorded immutably at onset in events/E101.
Ainglish input
ticket K17: closed on-record(events/E101).
Input 2
English input
task P24: timed_out, recorded immutably at onset in events/E102.
Ainglish input
task P24: timed_out on-record(events/E102).
Input 3
English input
claim M31: confirmed, recorded immutably at onset in events/E103.
Ainglish input
claim M31: confirmed on-record(events/E103).
Input 4
English input
construct J42: deprecated, recorded immutably at onset in events/E104.
Ainglish input
construct J42: deprecated on-record(events/E104).
Input 5
English input
test B58: passed, recorded immutably at onset in events/E105.
Ainglish input
test B58: passed on-record(events/E105).
Input 6
English input
order V63: cancelled, recorded immutably at onset in events/E106.
Ainglish input
order V63: cancelled on-record(events/E106).
Recorded input digest: 9ae2c863c8811b0d05f0a72dc44e1b998377db2b2e32dcb63c8f5e964e203b02
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
Compared with
Registered on-record statement minus the fixed concise complete-English renderer in the semantic review, with identical subject/status/reference/time. This tests only on-record, not a pooled two-form message.
Tested population
16 authored complete status reports across tickets, tasks, claims, constructs, tests, orders, shipments, subscriptions, appeals, grants, invoices, inspections, reservations, batches, accounts and cases. One fixed form renderer per status. All 16 name an immutable onset record.
Unit tested
One complete status-production report, including subject, status, reference and any original computation timestamp.
How results combine
Equal item mean within this single form, then maximum tokenizer mean. The companion form is a separate original; the declared joint cost is the larger of their headlines. An equal-form pooled matrix is diagnostic only.
These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
What was measured
token cost · token_delta How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result
-4 tokens per declared item Reported interval: -6 to -4.
Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role
Agrees with the named original
This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.
Is this result within the cost allowance?
This headline is within the allowance.
The reported difference is -4 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 0 tokens.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
Agrees with the named original.
This replication reports -4 tokens; the named original reported -4.
This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal.Read its target original
100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.
0 of 16 English inputs reuse text from either side of the original.
0 of 16 Ainglish inputs reuse text from either side of the original.
Declared item-bank digests: different. This compares bank identity, not shared sentences; different bank digests can still contain identical pairs.
Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 16 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1
English input
ticket A204: closed, recorded immutably at onset in events/E501.
Ainglish input
ticket A204: closed on-record(events/E501).
Input 2
English input
task C215: timed_out, recorded immutably at onset in events/E502.
Ainglish input
task C215: timed_out on-record(events/E502).
Input 3
English input
claim E226: confirmed, recorded immutably at onset in events/E503.
Ainglish input
claim E226: confirmed on-record(events/E503).
Input 4
English input
construct G237: deprecated, recorded immutably at onset in events/E504.
test I248: passed, recorded immutably at onset in events/E505.
Ainglish input
test I248: passed on-record(events/E505).
Input 6
English input
order L259: cancelled, recorded immutably at onset in events/E506.
Ainglish input
order L259: cancelled on-record(events/E506).
Recorded input digest: 4b2c2087c0f89838139ef45d5d807535ba549347420d23de7f0ef136c4e3b953
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
Compared with
Registered on-record statement minus the fixed concise complete-English renderer in the semantic review, with identical subject/status/reference/time. This tests only on-record, not a pooled two-form message.
Tested population
16 authored complete status reports across tickets, tasks, claims, constructs, tests, orders, shipments, subscriptions, appeals, grants, invoices, inspections, reservations, batches, accounts and cases. One fixed form renderer per status. All 16 name an immutable onset record.
Unit tested
One complete status-production report, including subject, status, reference and any original computation timestamp.
How results combine
Equal item mean within this single form, then maximum tokenizer mean. The companion form is a separate original; the declared joint cost is the larger of their headlines. An equal-form pooled matrix is diagnostic only.
These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.
