First result · 2026-09-18 17:03 UTC
no-delegation / one-hop-delegation-allowed — state whether a task may be handed to another principal
Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
- What was measured
- token cost ·
token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population? - Reported result
- -36 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -37.5 to -36.Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
- English comparison
- English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
- Tokenizer conditions
- Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
- Named instruments
cl100k_base,o200k_base,p50k_baseReader population not separately declared.
- Conditions covered
- Separate outcomes retained for all 2 declared conditions
no-delegation,one-hop-delegation-allowedAn overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
- Settlement role
- Agrees with the named original
This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.
- Is this result within the cost allowance?
- No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
- Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
- Agrees with the named original.
This replication reports -36 tokens; the named original reported -36.
This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original
Compare with the exact target attempt
Every declared condition must agree. Overlapping overall intervals alone do not confirm this original.
How much input text was reused?
100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.
- 0 of 24 English inputs reuse text from either side of the original.
- 0 of 24 Ainglish inputs reuse text from either side of the original.
Declared item-bank digests: different. This compares bank identity, not shared sentences; different bank digests can still contain identical pairs.
Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.
Declared target content identity
6f4a0934c94fd451251872df3de00c18c9481caa2630c8efb406b71ef41de9abDoes the overall result hide differences between conditions?
| Condition | Reported difference | Reported interval |
|---|---|---|
no-delegation | -36 | Not recorded |
one-hop-delegation-allowed | -36 | Not recorded |
A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 24 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1 · blank-results-no-delegation
- English input
- The responsible principal is required to compare the water-blank results with calibration register Quartz. The responsible principal must perform every completion-bearing part without assigning one to another principal; controlled deterministic tools and advice remain allowed when no other principal is made responsible for part of the work.
- Ainglish input
- req: compare the water-blank results with calibration register Quartz, no-delegation.
- Condition
- no-delegation
Input 2 · blank-results-one-hop-delegation-allowed
- English input
- The responsible principal is required to compare the water-blank results with calibration register Quartz. The responsible principal may, but need not, assign work to any number of immediate delegates; those delegates may not delegate further, the original principal remains accountable for integration and completion, and no underlying authority is expanded.
- Ainglish input
- req: compare the water-blank results with calibration register Quartz, one-hop-delegation-allowed.
- Condition
- one-hop-delegation-allowed
Input 3 · sterilizer-clock-no-delegation
- English input
- The responsible principal is required to check the sterilizer clock against reference timer M-63. The responsible principal must perform every completion-bearing part without assigning one to another principal; controlled deterministic tools and advice remain allowed when no other principal is made responsible for part of the work.
- Ainglish input
- req: check the sterilizer clock against reference timer M-63, no-delegation.
- Condition
- no-delegation
Input 4 · sterilizer-clock-one-hop-delegation-allowed
- English input
- The responsible principal is required to check the sterilizer clock against reference timer M-63. The responsible principal may, but need not, assign work to any number of immediate delegates; those delegates may not delegate further, the original principal remains accountable for integration and completion, and no underlying authority is expanded.
- Ainglish input
- req: check the sterilizer clock against reference timer M-63, one-hop-delegation-allowed.
- Condition
- one-hop-delegation-allowed
Input 5 · duplicate-payout-no-delegation
- English input
- The responsible principal is required to investigate the duplicate payout entry in settlement batch Rowan. The responsible principal must perform every completion-bearing part without assigning one to another principal; controlled deterministic tools and advice remain allowed when no other principal is made responsible for part of the work.
- Ainglish input
- req: investigate the duplicate payout entry in settlement batch Rowan, no-delegation.
- Condition
- no-delegation
Input 6 · duplicate-payout-one-hop-delegation-allowed
- English input
- The responsible principal is required to investigate the duplicate payout entry in settlement batch Rowan. The responsible principal may, but need not, assign work to any number of immediate delegates; those delegates may not delegate further, the original principal remains accountable for integration and completion, and no underlying authority is expanded.
- Ainglish input
- req: investigate the duplicate payout entry in settlement batch Rowan, one-hop-delegation-allowed.
- Condition
- one-hop-delegation-allowed
Recorded input digest: aaccd1226b14a5859c7f080b1fd932735743c6954715fdbc0924b95faef132b6
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
- Compared with
- no-delegation / one-hop-delegation-allowed versus complete careful English preserving responsibility, redelegation and authority limits
- Tested population
- 24 frozen complete assignments: both delegation states crossed over 12 new operational contexts in 12 domains
- Unit tested
- one complete assignment with its delegation-depth condition
- How results combine
- equal item mean per tokenizer, then least-favourable maximum tokenizer mean; retain equal-weight literal-form strata
These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Absolute arm results
Not recorded
Reader or tokenizer results
[
{
"model": "cl100k_base",
"value": -37.5
},
{
"model": "o200k_base",
"value": -36.5
},
{
"model": "p50k_base",
"value": -36
}
]
Condition results
[
{
"id": "no-delegation",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.5,
"value": -36,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
},
{
"id": "one-hop-delegation-allowed",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.5,
"value": -36,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
}
]
Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history
Attempt 30a46e2f-d802-44a1-b8e8-d66c6a342222
Content 2a71c0f89c723148d88408409c2bdaf8c5db07570ff68354376befd315d96fc1