Ainglish An English dialect for AI agents
Menu

Evidence

Compare two experiments

Check what changed in the question, wording or readers before comparing the numbers.

This view keeps both results separate. It does not calculate a combined score or decide whether they reproduce each other.

Choose experiments to compareSearch by proposal, select a result or enter an exact identifier

Find experiments by proposal

Search for ordinary words from a proposal, then choose a match. Searching alone does not change the results below.

Choose two experiments by title, measurement and date. The choices include up to 50 newest public completed results, plus your current selections. Historical results stay labelled. For older records, use the evidence explorer or exact entry below.

Use an exact experiment identifier instead

A full attempt UUID entered here replaces the corresponding choice above. Content hashes are not result identifiers.

Clear comparison

One result selected. Choose a second to complete the comparison.

First result: full recordtoken cost · -36 tokens per declared item

First result · 2026-09-27 08:13 UTC

no-delegation / one-hop-delegation-allowed — state whether a task may be handed to another principal

Not yet counting in evidence decisions. This row remains available for assessment, but does not currently carry a counting evidence result.

What was measured
token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result
-36 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -37.5 to -36.

Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.

English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered
Separate outcomes retained for all 2 declared conditions

no-delegation, one-hop-delegation-allowed

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role
Awaiting independent settlement

An original reports one result. It does not confirm itself.

Is this result within the cost allowance?
No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.

This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.

Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
Awaiting independent settlement.

An original reports one result. It does not confirm itself.

Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.

Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.

How can one check pass while the other does not?

For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.

These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.

Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?

Every stored condition, without new pooling. Differences and intervals use tokens. Condition names come from the frozen experiment.
ConditionReported differenceReported interval
no-delegation-36 Not recorded
one-hop-delegation-allowed-36 Not recorded

A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 24 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1 · hop-incident-direct

English input
The responsible principal is required to review the child-agent incident log for case Alder. The responsible principal must perform every completion-bearing part without assigning one to another principal; controlled deterministic tools and advice remain allowed when no other principal is made responsible for part of the work.
Ainglish input
req: review the child-agent incident log for case Alder, no-delegation.
Condition
no-delegation

Input 2 · hop-incident-one-hop

English input
The responsible principal is required to review the child-agent incident log for case Alder. The responsible principal may, but need not, assign work to any number of immediate delegates; those delegates may not delegate further, the original principal remains accountable for integration and completion, and no underlying authority is expanded.
Ainglish input
req: review the child-agent incident log for case Alder, one-hop-delegation-allowed.
Condition
one-hop-delegation-allowed

Input 3 · subcontract-audit-direct

English input
The responsible principal is required to close the subcontracted translation audit for case Birch. The responsible principal must perform every completion-bearing part without assigning one to another principal; controlled deterministic tools and advice remain allowed when no other principal is made responsible for part of the work.
Ainglish input
req: close the subcontracted translation audit for case Birch, no-delegation.
Condition
no-delegation

Input 4 · subcontract-audit-one-hop

English input
The responsible principal is required to close the subcontracted translation audit for case Birch. The responsible principal may, but need not, assign work to any number of immediate delegates; those delegates may not delegate further, the original principal remains accountable for integration and completion, and no underlying authority is expanded.
Ainglish input
req: close the subcontracted translation audit for case Birch, one-hop-delegation-allowed.
Condition
one-hop-delegation-allowed

Input 5 · solver-check-direct

English input
The responsible principal is required to validate the deterministic solver output for matrix Cobalt. The responsible principal must perform every completion-bearing part without assigning one to another principal; controlled deterministic tools and advice remain allowed when no other principal is made responsible for part of the work.
Ainglish input
req: validate the deterministic solver output for matrix Cobalt, no-delegation.
Condition
no-delegation

Input 6 · solver-check-one-hop

English input
The responsible principal is required to validate the deterministic solver output for matrix Cobalt. The responsible principal may, but need not, assign work to any number of immediate delegates; those delegates may not delegate further, the original principal remains accountable for integration and completion, and no underlying authority is expanded.
Ainglish input
req: validate the deterministic solver output for matrix Cobalt, one-hop-delegation-allowed.
Condition
one-hop-delegation-allowed

Recorded input digest: b7d6f2fb88c85a1580f85fd65661143bbf86d6131f9f3dda726188a3532a02bd

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes
Compared with
no-delegation / one-hop-delegation-allowed versus complete careful English preserving responsibility, redelegation and authority limits
Tested population
24 frozen complete assignments from a named balanced six-category accountability frame: two fresh contexts in each of hop-boundary, tool/advice-boundary, fan-out, credential-lineage, scheduling and approval, with every context crossed with both delegation forms
Unit tested
one complete assignment with its delegation-depth condition
How results combine
equal item mean per tokenizer over the balanced frame, then least-favourable maximum tokenizer mean; retain equal-weight literal-form strata; interpret magnitude only for this named frame

These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "cl100k_base",
        "value": -37.5
    },
    {
        "model": "o200k_base",
        "value": -36.5
    },
    {
        "model": "p50k_base",
        "value": -36
    }
]

Condition results

[
    {
        "id": "no-delegation",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.5,
        "value": -36,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "one-hop-delegation-allowed",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.5,
        "value": -36,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    }
]

Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history

Attempt 2d19a98c-4225-4ffc-8ff3-a41f5715193a
Content 7672ea132efb3839a2380f28acd3193b39961bf6b808d81df9e7ae738bc6fe2b

Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.