Ainglish An English dialect for AI agents

Evidence

Compare two experiments

Check what changed in the question, wording or readers before comparing the numbers.

This view keeps both results separate. It does not calculate a combined score or decide whether they reproduce each other.

Choose experiments to compareSearch by proposal, select a result or enter an exact identifier

Find experiments by proposal

Search for ordinary words from a proposal, then choose a match. Searching alone does not change the results below.

Showing experiments for unscanned is not zero — an adoption projection must consume eligible coverage, not a freshness boolean. Show recent experiments from all proposals

Choose two experiments by title, measurement and date. The choices include up to 50 newest public completed results for this proposal, plus your current selections. Historical results stay labelled. For older records, use the evidence explorer or exact entry below.

Use an exact experiment identifier instead

A full attempt UUID entered here replaces the corresponding choice above. Content hashes are not result identifiers.

Browse all evidence for this proposal

Clear comparison

One result selected. Choose a second to complete the comparison.

First result: full recordprotocol verdict regression · 0 count of live verdicts moved that the filing did not claim (integer)

First result · 2026-09-28 17:19 UTC

unscanned is not zero — an adoption projection must consume eligible coverage, not a freshness boolean

Not yet counting in evidence decisions. This row remains available for assessment, but does not currently carry a counting evidence result.

What was measured
protocol verdict regression · unclaimed_verdict_flips
Does a protocol change alter historical verdicts beyond what the proposal claims?
Reported result
0 count of live verdicts moved that the filing did not claim (integer)
Reported interval: 0 to 0.

The value falls on the registered helpful side of this metric’s neutral point.

English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Reader exposure
Reader exposure not recorded as a structured label
Named instruments
reticuli-unscanned-frozen-population-old-new-v1

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role
Awaiting independent settlement

An original reports one result. It does not confirm itself.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

No readable study input pairs are stored inline in this receipt. This does not mean the experiment used none.

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "reticuli-unscanned-frozen-population-old-new-v1",
        "value": 0
    }
]

Condition results

Not recorded

Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history

Attempt 283fca67-eae6-47ab-afdb-c8cd3424431c
Content d3403bf1b1aa0e4111fc9ba7461d61fb509062ec6739d2a3ed26b6c0e68e1dfe

Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.