First result · 2026-09-14 11:53 UTC
you-one / you-all — say whether “you” addresses one recipient or the whole group
Not yet counting in evidence decisions. This row remains available for assessment, but does not currently carry a counting evidence result.
- What was measured
- token cost ·
token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population? - Reported result
- -2.5 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -3.5 to -2.5.Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
- English comparison
- English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
- Tokenizer conditions
- Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
- Named instruments
cl100k_base,o200k_base,p50k_baseReader population not separately declared.
- Conditions covered
- Separate outcomes retained for all 4 declared conditions
you-one-subject,you-one-object,you-all-subject,you-all-objectAn overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
- Settlement role
- Awaiting independent settlement
An original reports one result. It does not confirm itself.
- Is this result within the cost allowance?
- No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
- Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
- Awaiting independent settlement.
An original reports one result. It does not confirm itself.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?
| Condition | Reported difference | Reported interval |
|---|---|---|
you-one-subject | -2 | Not recorded |
you-one-object | -2 | Not recorded |
you-all-subject | -3 | Not recorded |
you-all-object | -3 | Not recorded |
A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 32 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1 · sat-you-01
- English input
- In the private message to Mira, the one addressee must approve the revised fire plan by noon.
- Ainglish input
- In the private message to Mira, you-one must approve the revised fire plan by noon.
- Condition
- you-one-subject
Input 2 · sat-you-02
- English input
- In the private message to Niko, the one addressee may open the sealed archive after nine.
- Ainglish input
- In the private message to Niko, you-one may open the sealed archive after nine.
- Condition
- you-one-subject
Input 3 · sat-you-03
- English input
- In the private message to Priya, the one addressee should retain the blue shipping receipt.
- Ainglish input
- In the private message to Priya, you-one should retain the blue shipping receipt.
- Condition
- you-one-subject
Input 4 · sat-you-04
- English input
- In the private message to Oren, the one addressee received the inspection waiver yesterday.
- Ainglish input
- In the private message to Oren, you-one received the inspection waiver yesterday.
- Condition
- you-one-subject
Input 5 · sat-you-05
- English input
- In the private message to Leila, the one addressee can reschedule the clinic appointment once.
- Ainglish input
- In the private message to Leila, you-one can reschedule the clinic appointment once.
- Condition
- you-one-subject
Input 6 · sat-you-06
- English input
- In the private message to Tomas, the one addressee is exempt from the weekend embargo.
- Ainglish input
- In the private message to Tomas, you-one is exempt from the weekend embargo.
- Condition
- you-one-subject
Recorded input digest: 24abc8e31ae22f827fdae87f7fd0be2b9cef64cb96bc850e838324070582d920
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
- Compared with
- number-marked you-one or you-all versus its full lossless careful-English single-addressee or every-addressed-member mapping in the same resolved addressing context
- Tested population
- 32 frozen complete addressed messages, eight each for singular subject, singular object, plural subject, and plural object usage
- Unit tested
- one complete addressed message with a resolved utterance-time audience
- How results combine
- equal item mean inside four form-by-syntax strata; equal stratum weight per tokenizer; least-favourable maximum tokenizer mean as headline
These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Absolute arm results
Not recorded
Reader or tokenizer results
[
{
"model": "cl100k_base",
"value": -3.5
},
{
"model": "o200k_base",
"value": -3.5
},
{
"model": "p50k_base",
"value": -2.5
}
]
Condition results
[
{
"id": "you-one-subject",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.25,
"value": -2,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
},
{
"id": "you-one-object",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.25,
"value": -2,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
},
{
"id": "you-all-subject",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.25,
"value": -3,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
},
{
"id": "you-all-object",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.25,
"value": -3,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
}
]
Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history
Attempt 1da0a205-10d2-4568-8475-bd02355a19b4
Content f4abc7b5878057ed06e97187de121b80e02533f31b67e88a020b05496c628670