Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
What was measured
token cost · token_delta How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result
4 tokens per declared item Reported interval: 2 to 4.
More tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered
Separate outcomes retained for all 2 declared conditions
assigned-to, accepted-by
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role
Agrees with the named original
This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.
Is this result within the cost allowance?
This headline is within the allowance.
The reported difference is 4 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 4 tokens.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
Agrees with the named original.
This replication reports 4 tokens; the named original reported 4.
This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal.Read its target original
Every declared condition must agree. Overlapping overall intervals alone do not confirm this original.
How much input text was reused?
100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.
0 of 128 English inputs reuse text from either side of the original.
0 of 128 Ainglish inputs reuse text from either side of the original.
Declared item-bank digests: different. This compares bank identity, not shared sentences; different bank digests can still contain identical pairs.
Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.
Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?
Every stored condition, without new pooling. Differences and intervals use tokens. Condition names come from the frozen experiment.
Condition
Reported difference
Reported interval
assigned-to
4
Not recorded
accepted-by
4
Not recorded
A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 128 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1 · ex-20260930-assigned-to-001
English input
the Nimbus password reset is assigned to agent Ada by coordinator Imani.
Ainglish input
the Nimbus password reset assigned-to(agent Ada; by=coordinator Imani).
Condition
assigned-to
Input 2 · ex-20260930-accepted-by-001
English input
agent Ada accepted responsibility for the Nimbus password reset in acceptance-event-701.
Ainglish input
the Nimbus password reset accepted-by(agent Ada; ref=acceptance-event-701).
Condition
accepted-by
Input 3 · ex-20260930-assigned-to-002
English input
the Porcelain troubleshooting guide is assigned to agent Benoit by coordinator Jules.
Ainglish input
the Porcelain troubleshooting guide assigned-to(agent Benoit; by=coordinator Jules).
Condition
assigned-to
Input 4 · ex-20260930-accepted-by-002
English input
agent Benoit accepted responsibility for the Porcelain troubleshooting guide in acceptance-event-702.
Ainglish input
the Porcelain troubleshooting guide accepted-by(agent Benoit; ref=acceptance-event-702).
Condition
accepted-by
Input 5 · ex-20260930-assigned-to-003
English input
the Linen access response is assigned to agent Chandra by coordinator Keiko.
Ainglish input
the Linen access response assigned-to(agent Chandra; by=coordinator Keiko).
Condition
assigned-to
Input 6 · ex-20260930-accepted-by-003
English input
agent Chandra accepted responsibility for the Linen access response in acceptance-event-703.
Ainglish input
the Linen access response accepted-by(agent Chandra; ref=acceptance-event-703).
Condition
accepted-by
Recorded input digest: 3bf59c109273e92a3a8eee70f9e8e37764313f50c4f7722306ecceeacce83eff
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
Compared with
Marked statement minus concise complete English: T is assigned to A by P; A accepted responsibility for T in R. Identical task and principal references and attributable acceptance event. No bare status comparator.
Tested population
128 authored task statements: 64 operative current assignments and 64 attributable deliberate acceptances; eight task domains equally weighted within each form, eight task titles per domain. Named fictional principals and bounded task references are resolved in the shared ledger.
Unit tested
one complete task assignment or acceptance statement
How results combine
equal item mean within two equally weighted form strata per tokenizer, then maximum tokenizer mean; report both form strata
These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.
