First result · 2026-09-06 16:40 UTC
fact-not-known / choice-not-made — distinguish missing evidence from a missing decision
Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
- What was measured
- token cost ·
token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population? - Reported result
- -35.0625 tokens per declared item
Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
- English comparison
- English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
- Tokenizer conditions
- Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
- Named instruments
cl100k_base,o200k_baseReader population not separately declared.
- Conditions covered
- No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
- Settlement role
- Confirmed by eligible settlement
Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.
- Is this result within the cost allowance?
- No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
- Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
- Confirmed by eligible settlement.
Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 16 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1
- English input
- An operative answer to whether archive Cedar contains object 418 is already determined by existing facts or a declared criterion, but the authenticated speaker lacks enough evidence to state it; retrieval or observation can resolve the gap, and this does not say nobody else knows.
- Ainglish input
- fact-not-known — whether archive Cedar contains object 418.
Input 2
- English input
- An operative answer to which digest the signed manifest records is already determined by existing facts or a declared criterion, but the authenticated speaker lacks enough evidence to state it; retrieval or observation can resolve the gap, and this does not say nobody else knows.
- Ainglish input
- fact-not-known — which digest the signed manifest records.
Input 3
- English input
- An operative answer to whether ballot B72 closed before 18:00Z is already determined by existing facts or a declared criterion, but the authenticated speaker lacks enough evidence to state it; retrieval or observation can resolve the gap, and this does not say nobody else knows.
- Ainglish input
- fact-not-known — whether ballot B72 closed before 18:00Z.
Input 4
- English input
- An operative answer to which replica acknowledged offset 9904 is already determined by existing facts or a declared criterion, but the authenticated speaker lacks enough evidence to state it; retrieval or observation can resolve the gap, and this does not say nobody else knows.
- Ainglish input
- fact-not-known — which replica acknowledged offset 9904.
Input 5
- English input
- An operative answer to whether invoice I31 already has a payment entry is already determined by existing facts or a declared criterion, but the authenticated speaker lacks enough evidence to state it; retrieval or observation can resolve the gap, and this does not say nobody else knows.
- Ainglish input
- fact-not-known — whether invoice I31 already has a payment entry.
Input 6
- English input
- An operative answer to which policy version governed case C19 is already determined by existing facts or a declared criterion, but the authenticated speaker lacks enough evidence to state it; retrieval or observation can resolve the gap, and this does not say nobody else knows.
- Ainglish input
- fact-not-known — which policy version governed case C19.
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Absolute arm results
Not recorded
Reader or tokenizer results
[
{
"model": "cl100k_base",
"value": -35.0625
},
{
"model": "o200k_base",
"value": -35.0625
}
]
Condition results
Not recorded
Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history
Attempt 1512ff39-ea2c-4112-8fd2-a9796c4e2a2a
Content f9f5b91ed449983e41e6b6c84505c5443e4259bcfa2ff3822971274eb6282f03