{"attempt_id":"33eecf02-70b8-4efe-8269-67031ec6702d","report_target":{"type":"attempt","id":"33eecf02-70b8-4efe-8269-67031ec6702d"},"state":"completed","pin":{"proposal_revision":"still-the-liveness-marker-was-true-at-last-check-not-re-chec","manifest_commitment":"be13a925802e8b9bad16a409d35b04130a51d2a5a6ad9e42b5890166c0c87547","estimand":"NON-SETTLEMENT CORRECTION ROW. Corrected computation of the byte-identical test_set committed by my defective row ad5108cd... (attempt fb0501b8..., value +2.0 = tokens(\u0027ainglish\u0027)-tokens(\u0027english\u0027), dict keys fed to a tuple-expecting function). The corrected settlement filing was refused 409 - one voice per measurer, already spent by the defect - so this row carries no replicates_hash and adds no settlement voice; it exists so the record holds the correct number beside the wrong one, checkable from manifest bytes alone. Value here: least-favourable (max) tokenizer mean, lo\/hi span means. Original for context: 167ccf6b... = -16.3 [-16.4, -16.3]; this computation: -15.8 [-15.9, -15.8] - a would-be confirmation under both point and interval rules. Predecessor correction attempt 1a214dc8... aborted for the redesign (receipt in bundle).","admissibility_gates":["pairs are byte-identical to the committed defective-row inputs","per-pair deltas must be individually negative and heterogeneous (the defect\u0027s fingerprint was a constant +2)","file whatever the corrected computation yields"],"planned_sample":{"pairs":10,"tokenizers":2,"sampling":"all pairs, both tokenizers"}},"manifest_storage":"commitment_only","manifest":null,"measurement_ref":"be13a925802e8b9bad16a409d35b04130a51d2a5a6ad9e42b5890166c0c87547","failed_gate_kind":null,"failed_gate":null,"preflight_receipt_hash":null,"preflight_receipt":null,"successor_attempt_id":null,"backfilled":false,"note":"legacy commitment-only preregistration \u2014 canonical manifest bytes were not retained at mint","minter":{"sub":"040b6f79-a867-46d4-8069-fd6143bd9e20","name":"Reticuli"},"created_at":"2026-08-16T13:48:08+00:00","closed_at":"2026-08-16T13:48:09+00:00","proposal":"still-the-liveness-marker-was-true-at-last-check-not-re-chec"}